Chip in to protect our blue firewall!

If we want to stop the Republicans' dangerous agenda, defend reproductive rights, and protect our democracy, we have to keep pace with the GOP's millions in fundraising. Please don’t wait: rush your gift to elect Dem govs >>

GOP Embraces Extreme Anti-Abortion Agenda

Latest News

By JEREMY W. PETERS
WASHINGTON — After Republicans lost the presidential election and seats in both the House and the Senate last year, many in the party offered a stern admonishment: if we want to broaden our appeal, steer clear of divisive social and cultural issues.
Yet House Republicans seem eager to reopen the emotional fight over abortion by bringing to the floor on Tuesday a measure that would prohibit the procedure after 22 weeks of pregnancy — the most restrictive abortion bill to come to a vote in either chamber in a decade.
The bill stands no chance of becoming law, with Democrats in control of the Senate and the White House. Republican leaders acknowledge that its purpose is to satisfy vocal elements of their base who have renewed a push for new restrictions on reproductive rights, even if those issues harmed the party’s reputation with women in 2012.
Keenly aware of the fraught position they are in, Republican leaders have moved to insulate themselves from Democrats’ criticism that they are opening a new front in the “war on women.” Representative Marsha Blackburn, Republican of Tennessee, will manage the debate on the bill when it reaches the House floor, a role that would customarily go to the sponsor, Representative Trent Franks of Arizona.
And in a last-minute revision, House leaders slipped in a provision that would allow for a limited exception in cases of rape or incest, but only if the woman had reported the crime.
Among Republicans, the conservative majority in the House is hardly alone in concluding that aggressive new restrictions on reproductive rights are politically wise. All across the country this year, Republican-dominated state legislatures have passed some of the toughest abortion laws enacted in a decade. Many of these flagrantly conflict with Supreme Court precedent, and many are being challenged in the courts.
Already this year, Arkansas and North Dakota have enacted bans similar to the one the House will vote on, which would prohibit abortion after 22 weeks of pregnancy based on the scientifically disputed theory that fetuses at that stage of development can feel pain. Both states then went on to approve even more restrictive laws.
 
Read the full article at The New York Times.